HDD v SSD compiling benchmarks

Posted on 2 mins read

If there ever was a subject that caused more unfounded claims and counter-claims, it’s performance benchmarking. Given the dearth of useful info I’ve been able to find about whether SSDs improve compilation time or not, I thought I would put up the numbers that I have found during a small test I did today.

Program to be compiled:

  • Java webapp of ~10,000 executable lines of code
  • Maven 3
  • Java 1.6

New system:

  • HP Compaq 8100 Elite Convertible Minitower PC
  • Intel Core i7
  • 6GB ram
  • 64-bit Windows 7
  • OCZ Vertex SATA SSD 60GB
  • Barracuda 7200.12 SATA 3Gb/s 500GB HDD

Old system:

  • Dell Dimension 9200
  • Intel Core 2 6300
  • 4GB ram
  • SATA 260GB HDD

Benchmark Results

All times are as reported by Maven, not of the entire duration of the shell command. Test command: mvn clean install

benchmark graph

So, across the three build runs I performed on each environment, the timings are pleasingly consistent. The good news is that my new PC significantly outperforms my old one. The somewhat surprising news is that the HDD is consistently marginally quicker than the SSD. This suggests that this maven goal is not bound by disk I/O, that it is something else about my new system’s spec that gives such a performance boost. This actually reinforces what Joel Spolsky found when he ran a similar test a couple of years ago, and also one of the golden rules about working on performance - your assumptions will be wrong so measurement is king. Amen.

comments powered by Disqus